--- /dev/null
+{%extends "base/page.html"%}
+{%block title%}Core Team Report: June 2018 - May 2019{%endblock%}
+{%block contents%}
+
+<h1>Core Team Report: June 2018 - May 2019<i class="fas fa-comments"></i></h1>
+
+<p>This is a high level report of the activities of the PostgreSQL Core Team
+ during the period of June 2018 to May 2019. This is not an exhaustive list;
+ as can be imagined, some activities must be kept confidential for privacy
+ and other reasons.</p>
+
+<ol>
+ <li><p><b>Multiple requests for approval to use the logo and project
+ name.</b></p>
+
+ <p>We received a number of requests from various individuals and
+ organisations to use the project logo and name in conjunction with
+ events, support and consulting services and production of Open Source
+ related swag. None were refused.</p></li>
+
+ <li><p><b>Multiple questions about our licence, all responded to.</b></p>
+
+ <p>We received a number of enquiries about our licence and what types of
+ usage it allows, whether a licence fee is required and so on. In all
+ cases a high level answer was given explaining that PostgreSQL may be
+ freely used, modified and redistributed, and that any further
+ questions should be referred to the enquirers legal advisors.</p></li>
+
+ <li><p><b>Significant time spent on pre-CoC conduct issues.</b></p>
+
+ <p>There were two ongoing conduct issues at the time the Code of Conduct
+ committee was formed in September 2018. The Core team continued to
+ work on these, but did not retroactively apply the Code of Conduct.
+ We did enlist the help of the CoC committee to both assist us, and
+ give them some experience.</p>
+
+ <p>One of the two issues was relatively simple, whilst the other
+ involved a significant amount of investigation and interim bans
+ from use of postgresql.org resources due to non-cooperation.
+ Cooperation was eventually received from all parties and the matter
+ was concluded in mid-May 2019, resulting in one personal and one
+ organisational temporary ban from use of PostgreSQL resources. In
+ both cases, "time served" was taken into account in determining the
+ length of the bans.</p>
+
+ <li><p><b>One conduct issue involving a senior developer dealt with.</b></p>
+
+ <p>One general (non-CoC) issue involving a senior developer was dealt
+ with following discussion and deliberations over a number of
+ weeks.</p>
+
+ <li><p><b>Significant time dealing with the complications caused by the
+ organisational ban discussed above.</b></p>
+
+ <p>The organisational ban implemented had potential ramifications on
+ events and parties not involved in the Code of Conduct
+ investigation. A great deal of discussion took place to understand
+ the effects of the ban on those parties, and how they could be
+ minimised.</p></li>
+
+ <li><p><b>A misuse of trademark issue was dealt with.</b></p>
+
+ <p>An organisation registered and started to use a domain name that
+ could lead uninformed members of the public to believe that their
+ website was the official website of the PostgreSQL community. This
+ matter was debated and discussed with the manager of the
+ organisation, who elected to use an alternative domain name.</p></li>
+
+ <li><p><b>Ongoing discussions on Patent Policy.</b></p>
+
+ <p>There have been ongoing discussions on the topic of Patent policies,
+ culminating in a meeting at PGCon 2019 where the topic was discussed
+ with a much wider audience. A policy draft is being produced, which
+ will be discussed within the Core team and other interested parties
+ (such as the committers), and will then be discussed with legal
+ counsel.</p></li>
+
+ <li><p><b>Discussions and subsequent updates to various project policies,
+ now all on www.postgresql.org.</b></p>
+
+ <p>The project policies stored on <a
+ href="https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Policies">
+ wiki.postgresql.org</a> have all been reviewed, updated where
+ appropriate, and moved to the <a href="/about/policies">main
+ website</a>.</p></li>
+</ol>
+{%endblock%}
\ No newline at end of file